Public administration and civil service reform, Russia
We worked with the Government of the Russian Federation to review the objectives and functions of government departments and agencies.
Project team members
-
DateJanuary 2004 - January 2007
-
Areas of expertiseGovernance , Research and Evidence (R&E)
-
Client
UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO)
-
KeywordsClimate governance , Forestry and land use , Adaptive management , Capacity building , Data collection , Diagnostics , Impact evaluation , Inequality , Policy implementation , Policy options , Research uptake , Technical assistance , Value for Money (VFM) , Public Sector Governance (PSG) , Public Financial Management (PFM) , Accountability , Budgeting , Conflict security and violence , Economic policy , Fiscal decentralisation , Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL)
-
OfficeOPM United Kingdom
-
Project number
2592
This included reviewing staffing requirements, together with the design and introduction of results-oriented planning and performance appraisal techniques. We also reviewed the modern financial management and budgeting practice, linked to the new planning and appraisal system.
Challenges
These new techniques needed to:
- be objective-oriented and output-based (with emphasis upon best practice and value for money);
- improve working practices in the state sector (with emphasis upon public services and efficient interaction by public servants with internal and external customers); and
- include structural and organisational reviews of government executive authorities
Our approach
We undertook discussions with the Accounts Chamber – Russia’s supreme audit institution – to scope out possible functional reviews and sought, where possible, engagement of the UK National Audit Office in the programme of modernisation recently launched by the Accounts Chamber.
A key concern was to engender a greater delegation of responsibility and freedom of action - together with increased accountability for the achievement of objectives - to the managers of government bodies.
We also aimed to:
- outline reforms to the existing human resources management practices (including the introduction of performance-based contracts for particular specialist groups, merit-based recruitment and selection procedures, and more competitive pay levels);
- review and transform the key interactions between government bodies and the public (for example, through the introduction of the ‘one-stop shop’ or ‘single window’ approach); and
- ensure greater transparency in the civil service.
Outcomes
Our aim was to promote freedom and accessibility of information and public participation in the reform process; and improve training and human resource development within the public service.